Pagina 1 di 1

Messaggio Down The Field, The Current Roster Is Ill-equipped To Give Rodgers A Greg Jennings-like Player Who Can Win Right Away Un

#1  elaine95 Mer 15 Mag, 2019 07:59

Sean McVay’s Los Angeles Rams hung 30 points on a ferocious Dallas Cowboys defense on Saturday night Clay Matthews Jersey , providing more evidence for the NFL’s lust to find a coach who can reinvigorate a program the way McVay has. But it should have been 50 and a romp, rather than 30 and a close, single-score win. For all the love for McVay as a play designer and playcaller — creating chunk plays and wanting to hit the home run every snap — he’s not a particularly aggressive coach. If Matt LaFleur brings anything from his time in LA, hopefully for him it’s an understanding that attacking in all facets gives his team the best chance to win, a lesson McVay hasn’t quite learned. It may seem strange to criticize a coach who punted just once against the 9th ranked defense by DVOA, but here we are. On back-to-back drives early in the game, McVay settled for field goals inside the 10-yard line, the first on 4th-and-3 from the 7, and the second on fourth-and-goal at the 5. Two impressive drives led to six points and the Rams still trailed the Cowboys 7-6 after the second one.The game’s only punt from the Rams came after the Cowboys declined a penalty that would have replayed third down, giving McVay fourth-and-2 at the Dallas 47. Fourth-and-short in plus territory should be an automatic decision, especially for an offense as efficient as the Rams with Todd Gurley. McVay punted up eight with the Cowboys having just marched down the field and making it a one-score game with a touchdown. This isn’t a small sample size problem either. The Rams were among the least aggressive teams in the league last season going on fourth down, attempting just 15 conversions, tied for 20th in the NFL. And the only two teams worse at converting those fourth downs were the hapless Cardinals and Bills, in part because two of those were actually fakes in the kicking game not traditional conversions. Meanwhile, they were second in the league in attempting field goals, underscoring McVay’s reticence to go for it on fourth down. That’s a tough look for the SoCal wunderkind. But all attempted conversions have context. So I went back and looked at all 41 field goal attempts from the Rams and found a troubling trend emerge. Considering three of those kicks ended the half, the real number we should be working with is 38 where McVay had a real decision to make. McVay settled for field goals 13 times on fourth-and-short inside the 20 and 11 times inside the 10 with eight being in goal-to-go situations. Of those 38 attempts not counting end-of-half kicks, 19 of them would have taken four yards or fewer to convert for first downs on fourth down. Making matters even worse, the Rams punted four times in plus territory, a cardinal sin of game management, including once inside their opponent’s 40. In essence, he’s making the wrong choice to kick half the time. That’s absolutely brutal. Thousands of words have been written about the flaw in most NFL coaches’ logic in those moments (I’d start here with this piece from Brian Burke who now works in ESPN’s analytics department). Particularly with a good quarterback, an excellent run game, and a creative offensive coach, these should be gimme decisions. You go for it. Ask Mike McCarthy in the NFC Championship Game. In fact, let’s ask McCarthy Mike Daniels Jersey , who was at one time the most aggressive coach in the league on fourth down and two-point conversion situations. How did the Packers fare in these situations under McCarthy and his disciple Joe Philbin in 2018? Mason Crosby attempted the third-most field goals of any kicker in the league with 37, but an incredible nine of them were end-of-half or game situations, so the Packers really only had 28 decisions to make. We’re also throwing out Week 17 because ... well, DeShone Kizer. The Packers settled for a field goal attempt just four times on fourth-and-short from inside the 20, with two of those coming against the Jets under Philbin, and not a single attempt inside the 10. Green Bay kicked twice in goal-to-go situations, but one kick was from the 20 thanks to a penalty and the other from the 11.In other words, the Packers consistently made the right calls to kick or go for it, attempting 20 fourth downs in all this season. If there was one major flaw with game calling for the Packers it was the punting in plus territory, something they did nine times last year, but nearly all of them were on fourth-and-10 or more. So how does this all tie into Matt LaFleur? Simple: there are plenty of ways to want to be like McVay, but this can’t be one of them. The same is true for McCarthy, who was himself an exceedingly bright coach for a long time before his methods grew dull. LaFleur has the most skilled quarterback in the league, a top offensive line, and plenty of playmakers. Mason Crosby can provide solid reliability but the Packers have to end their ugly cycling of taking the points. Be more forward-thinking and trust what the probabilities tell us about going for it: do it more often. Play to win rather than play not to lose, especially with Aaron Rodgers under center. Listen when the quarterback gives the head signal to go for it in opponent territory and don’t be afraid to go for it in the red zone rather than settle for field goals. Fixing the red zone offense will be one of LaFleur’s top tasks, but one of the truly unique things about McVay is his ability to call his best play regardless of the situation. Apply that same idea to fourth down and stop worrying about getting six yards when it’s fourth-and-five. Call the best play and pick up the most yardage possible. Rather than take the points, trust the quarterback, trust the offense, and get touchdowns not field goals. Aaron Rodgers has always been able to make the plays no one would even to attempt, something he showed even in a down year where he battled injuries all season. The Green Bay Packers’ new head coach has to get Rodgers and this offense back to making the plays most NFL quarterbacks make, the on-time, rhythm throws. When Rodgers operated Mike McCarthy’s offense at maximum velocity, these were base staples of this offense. He’d hit his back foot and the ball would come whizzing out, right into the waiting arms of Jordy Nelson or Greg Jennings. If it was third-and-7, the ball was going to come out to Nelson on a comeback Brett Favre Jersey , it would be in the perfect spot, and there was nothing the defense could do about it. First down. Everything started there, mostly because Green Bay had no running game to speak of in the middle part of the Rodgers-McCarthy era. But even off play action, the Packers wanted the quarterback to be able to come off that run fake, turn and fire. They could create big plays off those run fakes, or believe Rodgers could make something out of nothing on second-reaction plays when those quick throws weren’t there. More and more, that seemed to become a greater part of the offense, whether by design or by necessity. Clearly though, the plan stopped working as the offense sputtered in 2018, ultimately costing McCarthy his job. In 2014, when Rodgers won the MVP and the Packers boasted the best offense in football by DVOA, Green Bay’s quarterback finished third in the league in passer rating when getting the ball out in under 2.5 seconds. Even in his ‘down’ season of 2015, Rodgers finished 9th and Run the Table Rodgers (2016) finished 6th. In 2018, he was gulp average, just 14th in the league. The quick game relies on three main tent poles. The first is scheme. Are the routes and their combinations conducive to quick throws, or is the call all go routes on third-and-2? Those gimme throws on third down magically disappeared from this offense, in part because they became so infatuated with throwing on first down, something they did as much as any team in the league last season. It seemed like any time Davante Adams got single coverage, he could have beaten his defender on a slant for a first down, yet unlike a team like New Orleans or the Rams, who will call a play until a team proves it can be stopped, the Packers went away from staple plays that should have been killing teams. In Tennessee last season, Marcus Mariota held the ball an almost identical amount in terms of how often he got the ball out within 2.5 seconds according to Pro Football Focus’ numbers. If Matt LaFleur’s offense doesn’t prioritize getting the ball out quickly, how can that fix this problem schematically? The answer speaks to the core of the problem: it’s how often the ball comes out quickly, but how effective the quarterback is when it does. Jared Goff got the ball out quickly on just 33.8% of his dropbacks in 2018, the fewest in the league. But when he did Paul Hornung Jersey , he completed 72% of his throws and posted a 109.3 quarterback rating with 11 touchdowns and just two interceptions. Being efficient in that area sets up the opportunities down the field to take the shots we know Rodgers wants to take. The second tentpole of the quick passing game is the quarterback’s ability to see the field. We shouldn’t have any concerns about this with Rodgers, who thinks the game as well as any quarterback in the business. When he eschews quick throws and underneath routes, he does it knowingly. Either he doesn’t trust the play concept, doesn’t trust the route, or simply would rather create a big play down the field by improvising. LaFleur will have to instill confidence in Rodgers to more often let the offense do the work. McCarthy’s scheme rarely allowed for that because it required pinpoint precision from everyone involved. The innovation in the Shanahan/McVay offense rests, in part, on the notion that the scheme is doing more of the work. It requires less virtuosity from the quarterback and receivers. The Rams are one of the best receiver screen teams in football. Shanahan has long been the master of the leak play, going back to the days of his father, where the offense gets the whole field moving one way while a tight end or a back leaks out the backside. Making it easier on the quarterback facilitates the creation of confidence in the offense. But once Rodgers buys into the play design, which one hopes will happen quickly as the team pivots away from the stale McCarthy concepts, he has to trust his receivers. The scheme once again comes into play, if for no other reason than the ballet dance required in the old system no longer holds with what LaFleur wants to do. Receivers still need to be precise with their route running, but they don’t have to win on their own as consistently — it’s built into the play. This lends itself to easier decision making from the quarterback and it’s less about picking a guy who is likely to be open because of a matchup and more about the intent and design of the play itself. That clears the waters that can lead to indecisiveness and hesitation. The final tentpole of the quick passing game is the one least under control by the coach and quarterback: personnel. Do the Packers have players aside from Adams who can win early in their route? Even if the offense involves more receiver screens and built-in throws, guys still have to be able to get open early and create after the catch. With Randall Cobb’s impending free agency casting a shadow over this offense, Green Bay can’t say with much confidence it has a player capable of the kinds of short, sudden routes that teams like the Patriots rely so heavily on to beat teams. There will be players in the draft who could bring that dynamic elements, guys like Marquise Brown, Hunter Renfrow, Andy Isabella and others. Free agency brings intriguing names like Golden Tate and Jamison Crowder. Given the current structure of the team, with McCarthy wanting to bring in size/speed receivers who can win one-on-one down the field, the current roster is ill-equipped to give Rodgers a Greg Jennings-like player who can win right away underneath and turn 3 yards into 13 in the of an eye. That player could also be a pass-catching running back split out wide, something LaFleur and all the Shanahan-tree coaches employ. Even if Aaron Jones can work that into his repertoire, adding a player with more natural pass-catching ability would give the Packers a mismatch option in the passing game it hasn’t had since Ty Montgomery was a featured part of the offense. Whichever combination the Packers decide to employ, there must be some focus on getting back to what Rodgers used to do so well. The second-reaction greatness only works if the first-reaction game carries the brunt of the load. It doesn’t have to be all three-step drops. Rodgers is one of the best fade throwers in football and his ability to catch and fire to the sidelines with Adams has already been an effective weapon. But getting back to the rhythm passing game will lighten the burden on Rodgers to be great, while also making those virtuoso improv plays even more effective with the rest of the offense intact.

 elaine95 Sesso: Uomo
Età: 24
Registrato: Aprile 2019
Messaggi: 146
  • Torna in cima Vai a fondo pagina

NascondiQuesto argomento è stato utile?


Valuta questo argomento:                       

Valutazione Media Valutazione Minima Valutazione Massima Numero Valutazioni
0.00 0 0 0
Condividi Argomento DIGG ITA Fai Informazione KiPapa Ok Notizie Segnalo Bookmark IT
Inserisci un link per questo argomento

Pagina 1 di 1

Online in questo argomento: 0 Registrati, 0 Nascosti e 0 Ospiti
Utenti Registrati: Nessuno

 rappresenta una comunità virtuale! Non rappresenta una testata giornalistica in quanto viene aggiornato senza alcuna periodicità.
Non può pertanto considerarsi un prodotto editoriale ai sensi della legge n. 62 del 7.03.2001.